And where is our president? Afraid of „meddling.“ Afraid to take sides between the head-breaking, women-shackling exporters of terror — and the people in the street yearning to breathe free. This from a president who fancies himself the restorer of America’s moral standing in the world.
STEINHÖFEL
Liberal - Konservativ - Unabhängig
Our False Prophet appears to have no idea what a golden opportunity he’s passing up… overthrow this evil, terrorism-exporting enemy without firing a single shot… get their Armageddon-inspired nuke program off the world stage… and free 30 million people all at one time.
But the boy wonder is too stupid to see it… or somehow just doesn’t care?
And isn’t this what George W Bush told you was going to happen in the Middle East in the wake of Iraq’s liberation?
Maybe that’s why Barack Obama has so little apparent interest in finishing the job in Iran… no matter how much it benefits the US and free world.
That, and the fact that he’s already piled all his chips on legitimizing this vile regime- a democratic revolution at this point would be embarrassing.
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/
Zu den Bedenken in Kommentar # 1 möchte ich Michael Ledeen zitieren: „As Obama discovered just today, America will be accused of meddling on behalf of freedom, even if we do nothing. And the accusation will have been true, in the most fundamental sense, even though the State Department raced to deny it. We are the symbol of freedom in the modern world, and those fighting for freedom against tyrants will intuitively invoke our name and our Constitution in their struggle. They are right, for the very existence of America threatens the legitimacy of the tyrants.
We meddle because we exist.“
Ich bin mir nicht ganz sicher, ob eine Äußerung Obamas nicht sogar schädlich für die Proteste im Iran wäre. Persönlich wäre mir eine klare Kante lieber. Reagan hat immerhin auch die Gratwanderung geschafft…